I know, AP tests aren't fun like Angry Birds or Civilization 2, but when you mix the ideas together, I think it works. With traditional classes and credit, you either get credit for passing, or you don't because you failed. Credit is the same regardless of if you get a C or an A in the class. AP tests, however, grant college credit, the amount determined by the score. When I took the Spanish AP test the second time (let's not talk about the first), I got a 3 which gave me 12 college credits. Had I gotten a 5, I think it would've gone up to 18 college credits. That makes sense: your score reflects your knowledge, and you get more or fewer credits because of it.
Why doesn't school work this way? When I teach study hall classes, I see a lot of struggling with math. If a student doesn't comprehend a concept, the class moves along regardless. These students end up getting a poor grade for the entire class because they were forced to move along. But what if they could get a good grade on portions of the class? The next year, they could pick up where they left off, rather than just repeating the entire class. And rather than just giving a flat credit amount to all students that get a C or higher, they instead give a certain amount of credit depending on the amount of curriculum completed.
I can't create change on that level, but I can attempt to apply it to my own class. Rather than push everyone along at the same pace, offer a variety of assignments that they can choose to complete on their own time. It might create trouble for grading, and sometimes middle school students simply aren't self-motivated yet, but I could work around that by using the star values mentioned previously. Students would be required to complete a certain number of stars to get the points, but keep it low enough to be doable. Stay tuned for my plan to keep students motivated despite the seemingly low expectations.
No comments:
Post a Comment